Uncle Boonmee is as unencumbered by the trappings of narrative
as anything I’ve ever seen, which admittedly isn’t much compared to others.
Still, I doubt there are many movies that have done so little with a 100-minute
runtime. Uncle Boonmee won the Palm d’Or at the 2010 Cannes Film Festival (the
festival’s highest honor), and on one level it deserves it--it is gorgeously
photographed and evokes a half-remembered-dream feeling--while on another it’s
almost unforgivably glacial. I’m thinking in particular of how slowly the
actors deliver their lines, as if they were all half-asleep themselves.
The movie has a sizable following but to me it all seems rather
aimless. What, for instance, does the opening prologue involving an escaped
water buffalo have to do with a later tangent in which a catfish seduces a princess (you read that right)? On their own they’re interesting, but what is
writer-director Apichatpong Weerasethakul going for? As far as I can tell, he’s
talking about the relationship between humans and nature, and the ways they can
become messily, sometimes supernaturally, intertwined. That's is all well and good,
but what about that connection? What about that messy, supernatural
relationship? Beats me.
I’m not the kind to dismiss slow, artsy, foreign films--if
anything they’re my favorite kind--but Uncle Boonmee was simply not for me.
No comments:
Post a Comment